Difference between revisions of "Talk:2009-10"
From OCE Space Simulation
(2009-2010 Mission Debriefing Notes) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
What follows is an account of the mission debriefing that took place at the March 5th work session. | What follows is an account of the mission debriefing that took place at the March 5th work session. | ||
| − | The participant responsible for each discussion point have been identified so that any misrepresentations can be corrected. It is assumed that some earger spacesim member will take it upon themselves to reorganize this into a format to which other members can more easily add their thoughts and ideas. | + | The participant responsible for each discussion point have been identified so that any misrepresentations can be corrected (any mistakes can be blamed on DM). It is assumed that some earger spacesim member will take it upon themselves to reorganize this into a format to which other members can more easily add their thoughts and ideas. |
The meeting was divided into a discussion of what we thought went well and what we were less happy with. We mostly succeeded in following this plan. | The meeting was divided into a discussion of what we thought went well and what we were less happy with. We mostly succeeded in following this plan. | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
*We were only 2 days late launching, better than last year. | *We were only 2 days late launching, better than last year. | ||
*There were fewer glitches during the mission - the EECOM software had the most glitches. | *There were fewer glitches during the mission - the EECOM software had the most glitches. | ||
| + | *The planetary surface was really good. | ||
| + | *There were not too many disasters. | ||
| + | *"Final Countdown" was much appreciated. | ||
Revision as of 23:29, 7 March 2010
Mission Debriefing Session
What follows is an account of the mission debriefing that took place at the March 5th work session.
The participant responsible for each discussion point have been identified so that any misrepresentations can be corrected (any mistakes can be blamed on DM). It is assumed that some earger spacesim member will take it upon themselves to reorganize this into a format to which other members can more easily add their thoughts and ideas.
The meeting was divided into a discussion of what we thought went well and what we were less happy with. We mostly succeeded in following this plan.
The Good Stuff
- We were only 2 days late launching, better than last year.
- There were fewer glitches during the mission - the EECOM software had the most glitches.
- The planetary surface was really good.
- There were not too many disasters.
- "Final Countdown" was much appreciated.
