Talk:Hull Construction - Revision history

Q-Cumber at 22:04, 9 June 2010

2010-06-09T22:04:18Z

IronyFail at 17:13, 9 June 2010

2010-06-09T17:13:08Z

Rubberchickenben: Talk:Hull construction moved to Talk:Hull Construction: proper capitalization...sigh

2010-04-18T03:48:19Z

Talk:Hull construction moved to Talk:Hull Construction: proper capitalization...sigh

Cslatlantis at 05:13, 17 April 2010

2010-04-17T05:13:30Z

Avacar at 16:08, 12 April 2006

2006-04-12T16:08:14Z

Avacar: Faraday Cage

2006-04-12T16:08:00Z

Faraday Cage

Foo1 at 20:06, 10 April 2006

2006-04-10T20:06:07Z

Avacar: Added potential new Namespace concept

2006-04-10T16:21:32Z

Added potential new Namespace concept

Foo1 at 21:30, 9 April 2006

2006-04-09T21:30:30Z

Stefanido: Try and stay away from "Pseudoscience"

2006-04-09T03:52:10Z

Try and stay away from "Pseudoscience"

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:04, 9 June 2010
Line 23:		Line 23:

	Can we just put both of these on the same page or delete this page. If not, is there a reason for having both? [[User:IronyFail\|<font color="green">IronyFail</font> <font color="red">in ANAGL</font><font color="#0000FF">YPH 3D!</font>]] 13:13, 9 June 2010 (EDT)		Can we just put both of these on the same page or delete this page. If not, is there a reason for having both? [[User:IronyFail\|<font color="green">IronyFail</font> <font color="red">in ANAGL</font><font color="#0000FF">YPH 3D!</font>]] 13:13, 9 June 2010 (EDT)
		+	:Plating is more in depth and should be kept. >>>[[user:Q-Cumber\|<font color="green">Q-Cumber</font>]] 18:04, 9 June 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:13, 9 June 2010
Line 19:		Line 19:
	On a side note, when adding a new comment on a new topic, you should all start using the '+' button instead of 'edit'.		On a side note, when adding a new comment on a new topic, you should all start using the '+' button instead of 'edit'.
	- [[User:Avacar\|Avacar]] 12:08, 12 April 2006 (EDT)		- [[User:Avacar\|Avacar]] 12:08, 12 April 2006 (EDT)
		+
		+	==Hull Plating vs Hull Construction==
		+
		+	Can we just put both of these on the same page or delete this page. If not, is there a reason for having both? [[User:IronyFail\|<font color="green">IronyFail</font> <font color="red">in ANAGL</font><font color="#0000FF">YPH 3D!</font>]] 13:13, 9 June 2010 (EDT)

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 :::::I would have liked that...except my wiki skills are lacking--[[User:Foo1|Foo1]] 16:06, 10 April 2006 (EDT)
+::::::I kind of agree, this article is Pseudoscience, though I find the Drywall argument a bit.. dry. [[User:Cslatlantis|---<font color="red">Wernstrum</font>, <font color="#0099CC">Stargakat</font>, <font color="green">Jonas</font>]] 01:13, 17 April 2010 (EDT)
 == Faraday Cage ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:08, 12 April 2006
Line 18:		Line 18:

	On a side note, when adding a new comment on a new topic, you should all start using the '+' button instead of 'edit'.		On a side note, when adding a new comment on a new topic, you should all start using the '+' button instead of 'edit'.
		+	- [[User:Avacar\|Avacar]] 12:08, 12 April 2006 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:08, 12 April 2006
Line 10:		Line 10:

	:::::I would have liked that...except my wiki skills are lacking--[[User:Foo1\|Foo1]] 16:06, 10 April 2006 (EDT)		:::::I would have liked that...except my wiki skills are lacking--[[User:Foo1\|Foo1]] 16:06, 10 April 2006 (EDT)
		+
		+	== Faraday Cage ==
		+
		+	Guys,
		+
		+	the Faraday cage protection system only works if you can ground the cage. On a planet with a non-conductive surface, this would be a real problem.
		+
		+	On a side note, when adding a new comment on a new topic, you should all start using the '+' button instead of 'edit'.

← Older revision	Revision as of 03:48, 18 April 2010
(No difference)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-You're confusing the Habitat with the AYSE Drive again.  the Habitat is made from Drywall.  Or you can add a pseudo-science label to this article, and claim it is made from an aluminum shell with insulating blankets, etc.  [[User:Avacar|Avacar]] 11:59, 7 April 2006 (EDT)
+--[[User:Foo1|Foo1]] 16:06, 10 April 2006 (EDT)You're confusing the Habitat with the AYSE Drive again.  the Habitat is made from Drywall.  Or you can add a pseudo-science label to this article, and claim it is made from an aluminum shell with insulating blankets, etc.  [[User:Avacar|Avacar]] 11:59, 7 April 2006 (EDT)
 : I had the understanding that the whole pseudo-science debate was moved from the forums to the wiki. Perhaps we should add that all the habitat systems articles are pseudo science. --[[User:Foo1|Foo1]] 23:47, 8 April 2006 (EDT)
@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 :::What I meant by pheudo science is that the technology would be soundly based...but does not exist in 440. The hull construction is similar to that of aircraft and ships so it's science. It's pheudoscience because the actual hab at 440 is not made out of metal honeycomb. We should make a lable that explains that this is how the theoretical habitat works...otherwise viewers might get confused. The habitat article says that the hab is drywall...yet here it says that it's aluminium honeycomb...--[[User:Foo1|Foo1]] 17:30, 9 April 2006 (EDT)
-:::You are going to need to develop a wiki convention for dealing with this.  The Habitat is made of drywall, that needs to be stated.  Yet somewhere else you need to state what you are pretending it is made from.  (Or explain why your special super-dense drywall works in space).  Perhaps you should open up a new namespace, such as Pseudoscience:XXX  so that you can have Habitat and Pseudoscience:Habitat as seperate files, then make it a convention to have the namespaces cross-reference.  Thoughts? - [[User:Avacar|Avacar]] 12:21, 10 April 2006 (EDT)
+::::You are going to need to develop a wiki convention for dealing with this.  The Habitat is made of drywall, that needs to be stated.  Yet somewhere else you need to state what you are pretending it is made from.  (Or explain why your special super-dense drywall works in space).  Perhaps you should open up a new namespace, such as Pseudoscience:XXX  so that you can have Habitat and Pseudoscience:Habitat as seperate files, then make it a convention to have the namespaces cross-reference.  Thoughts? - [[User:Avacar|Avacar]] 12:21, 10 April 2006 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:21, 10 April 2006
Line 6:		Line 6:

	:::What I meant by pheudo science is that the technology would be soundly based...but does not exist in 440. The hull construction is similar to that of aircraft and ships so it's science. It's pheudoscience because the actual hab at 440 is not made out of metal honeycomb. We should make a lable that explains that this is how the theoretical habitat works...otherwise viewers might get confused. The habitat article says that the hab is drywall...yet here it says that it's aluminium honeycomb...--[[User:Foo1\|Foo1]] 17:30, 9 April 2006 (EDT)		:::What I meant by pheudo science is that the technology would be soundly based...but does not exist in 440. The hull construction is similar to that of aircraft and ships so it's science. It's pheudoscience because the actual hab at 440 is not made out of metal honeycomb. We should make a lable that explains that this is how the theoretical habitat works...otherwise viewers might get confused. The habitat article says that the hab is drywall...yet here it says that it's aluminium honeycomb...--[[User:Foo1\|Foo1]] 17:30, 9 April 2006 (EDT)
		+
		+	:::You are going to need to develop a wiki convention for dealing with this. The Habitat is made of drywall, that needs to be stated. Yet somewhere else you need to state what you are pretending it is made from. (Or explain why your special super-dense drywall works in space). Perhaps you should open up a new namespace, such as Pseudoscience:XXX so that you can have Habitat and Pseudoscience:Habitat as seperate files, then make it a convention to have the namespaces cross-reference. Thoughts? - [[User:Avacar\|Avacar]] 12:21, 10 April 2006 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:30, 9 April 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:

	::But what we're trying to do is get away from "pseudoscience" as much as possible. We're trying to base our systems off of existing systems with, perhaps, some extrapolations. I want to make absolutely clear that before you go creating something out of thin air, you should look at things that have already been built and inspire yourselves from there. [[User:Stefanido\|Stefanido]] 23:52, 8 April 2006 (EDT)		::But what we're trying to do is get away from "pseudoscience" as much as possible. We're trying to base our systems off of existing systems with, perhaps, some extrapolations. I want to make absolutely clear that before you go creating something out of thin air, you should look at things that have already been built and inspire yourselves from there. [[User:Stefanido\|Stefanido]] 23:52, 8 April 2006 (EDT)
		+
		+	:::What I meant by pheudo science is that the technology would be soundly based...but does not exist in 440. The hull construction is similar to that of aircraft and ships so it's science. It's pheudoscience because the actual hab at 440 is not made out of metal honeycomb. We should make a lable that explains that this is how the theoretical habitat works...otherwise viewers might get confused. The habitat article says that the hab is drywall...yet here it says that it's aluminium honeycomb...--[[User:Foo1\|Foo1]] 17:30, 9 April 2006 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:52, 9 April 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:

	: I had the understanding that the whole pseudo-science debate was moved from the forums to the wiki. Perhaps we should add that all the habitat systems articles are pseudo science. --[[User:Foo1\|Foo1]] 23:47, 8 April 2006 (EDT)		: I had the understanding that the whole pseudo-science debate was moved from the forums to the wiki. Perhaps we should add that all the habitat systems articles are pseudo science. --[[User:Foo1\|Foo1]] 23:47, 8 April 2006 (EDT)
		+
		+	::But what we're trying to do is get away from "pseudoscience" as much as possible. We're trying to base our systems off of existing systems with, perhaps, some extrapolations. I want to make absolutely clear that before you go creating something out of thin air, you should look at things that have already been built and inspire yourselves from there. [[User:Stefanido\|Stefanido]] 23:52, 8 April 2006 (EDT)